Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:          
> If you were a TM teacher, did you ever say in
> lectures, as you were taught to do, that it
> is impossible to transcend via concentration?
> Or that TM was the best, most effective method
> of meditation in the world, without having ever
> tried any other types of meditation, much less 
> all of them? 
>           Meditation Book Grant to Dr. Jonathan Shear of Virginia 
> Commonwealth University
          Dr. Jonathan Shear's Book on the Major Meditation Systems of the World
  I. The Project
  Meditation has become mainstream in America, as a part of many health 
programs, as a method of relaxation, and for spiritual growth, and as a topic 
in college courses around the country. There are, of course, already many books 
on the subject of meditation. Some discuss practices within a given tradition 
in a serious way. Others discuss meditation in a general way, but these are 
often superficial and misleading, if not simply inaccurate. But to date there 
is no book that presents in a clear, comprehensive, and systematic way the 
mechanics, theories and effects of the various major meditation systems now 
practiced and discussed in America. The book sponsored by this grant should 
fill this gap. Its contents and structure should enable it to serve as a 
readily accessible, cross-traditional textbook for a wide variety of college 
courses (e.g., religion, psychology, philosophy, multicultural studies, etc.), 
and as an authoritative reference for scholars. In addition, the book
 should be of interest to the many people who practice various forms of 
meditation and would like to know something about procedures other than their 
own, as well as those who are simply curious about the topic. The Infinity 
Foundation is delighted to announce its support of this project.
  Each of the chapters will deal with a single tradition of meditation. In 
order to facilitate inter-traditional comparisons, each chapter will cover the 
following topics:
  (1) historical background
(2) mechanics of the techniques
(3) basic experiences and states
(4) further results (psychological and/or behavioral effects, higher states, 
etc.)
(5) interpretations and implications
  The book will be edited by Dr. Jonathan Shear, who will also write an essay 
for inclusion within it.
  The authors and topics of the chapters are expected to include:
    
   Robert Thurman and David Gray (Tibetan meditation traditions)
Georg Feuerstein (Sankhya/Yoga)
Jeffrey Schwartz (Therevada Vipasana)
Don Salmon (Sri Aurobindo)
Sri Daya Mata (Kriya Yoga/Yogananda)
Liang Shou Yu and Wu Wen-Ching (Taoism/Qigong)
Llewelyn Vaughn Lee (Sufism)
Basil Pennington (Centering Prayer)
Jonathan Shear (Transcendental Meditation)   II. About the Editor
  Jonathan Shear received a BA in Philosophy and Mathematics summa cum laude 
from Brandeis University, and was a Woodrow Wilson Fellow in Philosophy at the 
University of California at Berkeley where he received his Ph.D. While a 
Fulbright Scholar in Philosophy of Science at the London School of Economics in 
the early 1960's, Dr. Shear became interested in Eastern accounts of aspects of 
mind not ordinarily discussed by Western philosophers and psychologists. This 
led to examination of how Eastern experiential procedures could provide an 
expanded empirical base for our Western theories of mind, knowledge and values, 
as well as regular practice of such procedures themselves, and the significance 
of such procedures and the experiences they produce has remained the focus of 
Prof. Shear's work for nearly forty years. He is author of The Inner Dimension: 
Philosophy and the Experience of Consciousness (Peter Lang), coeditor of The 
View from Within: First-Person Methodologies
 (Imprint Academic), coeditor of Models of the Self (Imprint Academic), and 
editor of Explaining Consciousness:
The Hard Problem (MIT). Prof. Shear is also a founding Editor of the 
multi-disciplinary Journal of Consciousness Studies, and an Affiliated 
Associate Professor of philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. 

> Was that logical?
> 
> The claim of "logic" tends to be the lipstick 
> that True Believers (of any ilk) put on the pig
> of their unsubstantiated yet deeply held beliefs.
>
++ You are right - I should have said It doesn't make sense or, it's
BS. N.



         

 
---------------------------------
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Reply via email to