--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you're likely skrying a future self of your own > intentionality, not necessarily her own.
Only insofar as everyone is my past-present-futureself. That particular dharma holds no real futurebliss for this-individual me, but I enjoy it greatly in Judy in this time :-) > It's not necessarily a good thing to confuse future-self and present- > self. > > >nonetheless she is > > > rather lovable in her own curmudgeonly way. > > > > Lovable, yes. Curmudgeonly? I'd say "exacting" -- upholding the > > Dharma of Truth to a "T" -- *not* supporting the TMO "party-line" > > when it deviates from the Truth, but also *not* supporting a knee- > > jerk/illogical attack on the TMO stemming from the hurt/anger/blame > > cycle mentioned above. > > Well we know our dear Judy is NOT a TMO fan...that's a given. She's a > critic, albeit operating on a group of assumptions imprinted from > that very TMO...and so sorely not referenced from other parallel and/ > or independent sources. It's hard to take her all that seriously. > Have you ever been annoyed by a fly? > > > > > > I've suggested many. Like the one Rory and I are talking about: an > > > Indian yogin and an American yogini, both of the Saraswati lineage > > > that Swami Brahmananda Saraswati was from. Both lineage holders: > > yogi/ > > > ni's who have realized the vision of all the chakra petals and > > routes > > > to Unity....and most importantly know how to help all types of > > > students, of all dispositions and doshas, and the sadhanas that > > lead > > > to Unity uniquely for them. I think that's a beautiful thing, a > > rare > > > thing and an important thing. > > > > And an *ideal* thing....Sounds as if *someone* may be putting > > *someone* up on another pedestal...? ;-) > > Naw. Just a recognition and appreciation of ability and skillful > means relevant to a suffering TMSP audience. > > And sometimes there's an answer. > > > > > And again, I am *not* at all sure how relevant the chakra-petals are > > to actual Awakening. And yet again, the misUnderstanding of the Hrit- > > padma is nothing to sneeze at! :-) > > Not much at all. I always loved Dr. Pete's example of subtle-body > maps as spiritual pornography. It truly can become just like that. > > > > > > Short of a sadhana chip implant, I don't know how much better it > > > could get. ;-) > > > > But that's what we all *have*, as far as I can see! :-) > > Don't assume everyone's attuned that much! >
