> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> > I(t) might be even more fun if you also admit that *I* am also an > > infinitesimal particle of You; it works both ways :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That can't be. That overstrains my brain. This turnaround thing has a > limit, tell this to Byron. *lol* > You can't be a particle of something, which > is a particle of you already. What you mean is Indras net: Everything > reflects everything else. YES YES YES! I LOVE YOU! :-) :-) :-) And also ... because Wholeness is continually collapsing into point(s), It gets to experience the *effect* (as a point) of its own *cause* (as Wholeness), and the *divinity* (from the viewpoint of the point, looking at Wholeness) of its own *humanity* (from the viewpoint of Wholeness, looking at point), und so weiter! :-) *L*L*L*
