--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > When I was asked the same question that you asked Jim and Rory, I have > > thought, what I would answer from my own very limited perspective of > > being only an infinitesimal particle of Rory, which I am sure I am, > <snip> > > I might be even more fun if you also admit that *I* am also an > infitesimal particle of You; it works both ways :-)
That can't be. That overstrains my brain. This turnaround thing has a limit, tell this to Byron. You can't be a particle of something, which is a particle of you already. What you mean is Indras net: Everything reflects everything else.
