--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 30, 2007, at 3:36 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: > >> > This reminds me of what Rory said a few posts back about CC, GC and > > > UC being transitory states. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > Yet this is just new age speculation. > > Au contraire, mon frere -- it is my direct experience :-) > >
Yet Jim in a post yesterday dismissed the analogy of acid induced states of being as not valid because they were not permanent. Thats not a gotcha quote. But a continuing crack of wonderment at the cosmic egg of your View. And while some may trot out the tired (IMO) saw of "you just can't handle paradox" -- I remind you of my view that mundane parodoxes are often not profound -- and are certainly not true by the fact that they contradictory statements. Sometimes, most of the time, contrdictory statements are just what they are.
