Ya I am pretty doubtful trusteeship and tracing will both appear this
time quite likely neither will - trusteeship has come up the last
three papers and tracing appeared last paper with a pattern of every
second...
Undue influence is quite likely although came up in April....
I also expect a charitable / cy pres appearance


On Oct 3, 4:15 pm, seán <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Know Trusteeship and tracing, injunctions, charitable trusts&cy pres
> and resulting trusts very well. "
>
> What makes you think Tracing and Trusteeship? Both came up last year
> didn't they and aren't hugely regular?
> Hopefully there's no change to the always asking an injunction
> question, and it's about time for a Quia Timet or Interloc Injunction
> question.
> Charitable came up last year, its a handy section though so hopefully
> it comes up again this year but I doubt it.
>
> Does anyone know if Undue Influence is likely to appear? Apparently it
> came up last time but I don't have that paper and detest UI so was
> hoping to be told its not too likely. Unfortunately I think Resulting
> Trusts are due a question too, another topic I'm terrible at and will
> avoid on the paper.
>
> On Oct 3, 2:37 pm, wyckham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Know Trusteeship and tracing, injunctions, charitable trusts&cy pres
> > and resulting trusts very well.
>
> > On Oct 3, 2:02 pm, Ruddy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > What does anyone think will be coming up?
>
> > > Recission and equitable doctrines havent appeared in last three
> > > sittings.
>
> > > Any further comments?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to