Perhaps: Specific Performance Undue Influence and Rescission Proprietary Estoppel Charitable Trusts perhaps Cy-pres Resulting Trusts Property Rights of Co-habitees Trusteeship
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Ruddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Question 8, April 2009 was undue influence problem question. Very > standard and not unlike past UI questions concerning transfer of > property from Elderly person to a neighbour etc, unlikely to appear in > same format this year, but essay? you can never know > > Trustee duty Aprill 2009 was specically related to investment duty. > > Specific performance hasnt been up in a while, think since Oct 2007, > when it was contracts requiring supervision. Think presumed resulting > trusts may appear as opposed to Automatic as they have been up in the > last 2 years, but still not one to avoid. > > Equitable doctrines and recission are really due an appearance. > On Oct 3, 4:15 pm, seán <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Know Trusteeship and tracing, injunctions, charitable trusts&cy pres > > and resulting trusts very well. " > > > > What makes you think Tracing and Trusteeship? Both came up last year > > didn't they and aren't hugely regular? > > Hopefully there's no change to the always asking an injunction > > question, and it's about time for a Quia Timet or Interloc Injunction > > question. > > Charitable came up last year, its a handy section though so hopefully > > it comes up again this year but I doubt it. > > > > Does anyone know if Undue Influence is likely to appear? Apparently it > > came up last time but I don't have that paper and detest UI so was > > hoping to be told its not too likely. Unfortunately I think Resulting > > Trusts are due a question too, another topic I'm terrible at and will > > avoid on the paper. > > > > On Oct 3, 2:37 pm, wyckham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Know Trusteeship and tracing, injunctions, charitable trusts&cy pres > > > and resulting trusts very well. > > > > > On Oct 3, 2:02 pm, Ruddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > What does anyone think will be coming up? > > > > > > Recission and equitable doctrines havent appeared in last three > > > > sittings. > > > > > > Any further comments? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
