Alex Karasulu wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
...
I also think that * <bundleSymbolicName> should default to
${pom.artifactId}
Yes, this is what I am doing already in my pom files. However, I was
wondering lately if we are doing the artifactId the best way. Right
now we have, for example:
* pom.groupId = "org.apache.felix"
* pom.artifactId = "org.apache.felix.scr"
I was wondering if it would be better to have:
* pom.groupId = "org.apache.felix"
* pom.artifactId = "scr"
Thus, the symbolic name would be:
* ${pom.groupId} + "." + ${pom.artifactId}
This would coincide with us cleaning up our trunk directory to only
show the unique part of the subproject name, as opposed to the
groupId part.
I am not sure if this would be a good move or a bad move from a maven
perspective, though.
...
It would be a good move from the maven perspective and the CLI
perspective. Using the full package name is a bit too much.
Well then, I will propose this for a vote next week...how does that sound?
-> richard
