Richard S. Hall wrote:
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
...
I was wondering if it would be better to have:
* pom.groupId = "org.apache.felix"
* pom.artifactId = "scr"
Thus, the symbolic name would be:
* ${pom.groupId} + "." + ${pom.artifactId}
This would coincide with us cleaning up our trunk directory to only
show the unique part of the subproject name, as opposed to the
groupId part.
I am not sure if this would be a good move or a bad move from a maven
perspective, though.
...
It would be a good move from the maven perspective and the CLI
perspective. Using the full package name is a bit too much.
Well then, I will propose this for a vote next week...how does that sound?
I agree with only using the "unique part of the subproject name" and
maintaining the symbolic name, as you describe.
As a major repo change this probably warrants a vote, but it does feel
like we have consensus.
Enrique
