On Monday 29 May 2006 13:40, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2006 20:55, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> > I was wondering if it would be better to have:
> >
> >     * pom.groupId = "org.apache.felix"
> >     * pom.artifactId = "scr"
> >
> > Thus, the symbolic name would be:
> >
> >     * ${pom.groupId} + "." + ${pom.artifactId}
>
> So, the symbolic name == the concatenated group.artifact... How about the
> Jar file name?? Is that getting the symbolic name + version ??

For reference; Maven will assign the jarName to our plugin as the artifactId + 
version, unless the <finalName> element has been defined in the POM, in which 
case that is set to the jarName property.

That means the normal override mechanism sits with the "finalName" element. Is 
that enough, considering one can write;

 <finalName>${pom.groupId}.${pom.artifactId}.${version}</finalName>

??

Cheers
Niclas

Reply via email to