2009/3/30 john skaller <skal...@users.sourceforge.net> > > > Yeah, felix is pretty speedy, but when you include the c++ compiler, > > the speeds go down a fair amount. I'm not sure if it would be that > > reasonable to work on a codebase the size of the felix compiler. > > Ocaml's probably one of the fastest compilers I've seen, but it > > still takes a couple minutes to compile felix for me. I can't > > imagine that felix+g++ could be orders of magnitude faster than ocaml. > > > At this time, parsing is the major problem. Before Dypgen, binding > dominated. >
Hi, Why not update to the last version of dypgen? parsing performances should improve. Besides, many bugs have been fixed since 2007. Emmauel Onzon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
