Le 28 avril 2026 16:39:32 GMT+03:00, Romain Beauxis via ffmpeg-devel <[email protected]> a écrit : >Le ven. 17 avr. 2026 à 08:06, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel ><[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Le lundi 13 avril 2026, 02:14:15 heure d’été d’Europe de l’Est Leo Izen via >> ffmpeg-devel a écrit : >> > On 4/12/26 12:41, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> > > Hi everyone >> > > >> > > Last easterbunny brought eggs and in one egg there was a life fairy. >> > > She said her name is forgejo fairy and she wants to help the project >> > > and community. >> > >> > Can we veto an LLM slop bot? Does anybody here actually want a slopbot? >> >> Nobody wants a slop bot. >> >> Some people might like a not-slop bot that would make mostly valuable review >> comments. But that really should be opt in, not forced upon everyone, at the >> very least until it has established a proven track record of quality and >> usefulness. >> >> And I am not even touching on the moral questions (including but not limited >> to the environmental cost of AI). > >I do share the concern about environmental cost of course. There's a >mega AI data center that's about to be built here in Louisiana in the >middle of one the hottest state that will generate more natural gas >pollution than 2 to 5 millions homes. This makes no sense. > >That being said, if you want to call it slop, it'd be good to be pragmatic.
I didn't call any particular LLM slop. I just quoted Leo. And to be fair to Leo, LLM slop does exist. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
