On 12/28/2015 03:45 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 8 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit :
By the way, here's a clip from the old patch (THIS one had significant parts
written by Carl alright) that got rave reviews from Hendrik Leppkes, calling
it "an extremely ugly hack", complaining at the calling into another demuxer
(by using the ff_mov_read_stsd_entries() function in mov.c):
What is the point of bringing that up?
Regards,
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
The point is to make people understand he didn't write "significant
parts" of the latest patch. I want to make that clear. Not that I care
who wrote it, as long as it works. I just don't like his grabbing the
honor for something he didn't write (except for the stuff we already
mentioned).
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
