Tony writes ...
> > unless you have used a tripod, 4000 dpi won't necessarily get you
more
> > detail. The extremely small jitters you would have hand holding
closes
> > the gap between 2820 dpi and 4000dpi in a hurry.
>
> We handholding gods of available darkness would have to disagree
here.
> Camera shake is controllable, with care, down to quite low speeds
even
> hand held, it's the damn subjects which won't keep still.
I would tend to agree ... after all, it is because we sometimes
get it right or because we may use a tripod on a rare occasion, that
we choose quality lenses. No one is going to blame anyone for going
for 4000dpi, even when he (or she) will rarely see the benefit.
shAf :o)
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
