----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:07 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE:
>
> I meant that PS seems to do less damage to the data, ie rounding
> errors and consequent drop-outs, combing etc, than OE scanner software
> does. Or than some lesser imaging programmes do.
>
> I don't know why this should be the case, or even whether it definitely is,
but
> that is how it looks to me.
>
I've found using cache for the histograms in PS makes things look smoother than
they really are. When PS histogram is set to show the real data things
usually look like scanner software in my experience. I've long since forgotten
which way PS defaults to.
Anyway, that might be the difference you are seeing.
Cheers,
Byron
