> what I intended to call attention to was that with the > original Epson Stylus printer, a 5" x 7" image whose resolution was 600 > dpi printed out blurry as compared to the same 5" x 7" image downsampled > to somewhere between 240 and 300 dpi. > > On that particular printer, at least, it caused print degradation to use > an unnecessarily high source image resolution. At least if you downsample before printing, you get the chance to apply USM. Which I regard as essential with Epson printing. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question shAf
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Ezio
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Hampton Childress
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question shAf
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi questio... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi questio... Hampton Childress
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi questio... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi questio... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Hampton Childress
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi questio... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question =shAf=
- Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Rob Geraghty