Mike, I am glad you have had so much success. But you apparently have far more experience and equipment than I do. All your great luck with "C prints" helps me none. What I have is what I have. And with what I have I should be able to get the LS-30 to produce a scan that is in focus. If you or anyone is able to get a nice shot with a 4 x 5 negative, well bully for you. Some of us don't have the resources to do the same. Guy Tuesday, November 28, 2000, 2:18:57 PM, you wrote: MM> 1. The density range of a good repro quality C print is a lot closer to the MM> density range of printed materials than transparencies...
- Re: Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what t... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what t... Tony Sleep
- Re: Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what t... Rob Geraghty
- Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Tony Sleep
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Truncated messages filmscanner
- Re: filmscanners: Truncated messages Tony Sleep
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Guy Prince
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see... Michael Moore
- Re[2]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they ... Guy Prince
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see... Michael Moore
- Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Tony Sleep
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... bjs
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Mark Ligtenberg
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Thank you to Tony and everyone on T... Guy Prince
- Re: filmscanners: Thank you to Tony and everyone ... Tony Sleep