> I have heard of the Nero Burn software. Is there a consensus > of opinion about this over Adaptec? NERO has a good reputation. Personally I use Gear, which is idiosyncratic and strange but very clever with buffering, it never produces coasters unless I do something really stupid. Adaptec is, IME, poor - it has very little resilience to underruns. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Chris McBrien
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Chris McBrien
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Tim Atherton
- filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks Chris McBrien
- RE: filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks shAf
- RE: filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: OT: Failed CDR disks shAf
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Charles Knox
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Mike Kersenbrock
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Mike Kersenbrock
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Film Scanners and what they see. Laurie Solomon