Ray, Were you able to compare a 2880 scan printed with the Fuji system? The conclusion you draw seems to be a bit hasty. : ) Spencer Stone Bob: I had an interesting experience the other day. I had a 35mm slide printed(8x10) by the Fuji Frontier 370 system. The Fuji system is apparently 5000 dpi and uses a laser to expose Fuji Crystal paper which is then chemically developed. The Fuji print was noticeably sharper(by unaided eye) then the same slide scanned on my Minolta Elite(2880 dpi) and printed at 8x10 with an Epson 1270. Examining the Fuji print with a 20x magnifier revealed that it was much smoother then the Epson print(In addition to resolving more detail). The interesting part is that the scan itself has the fine detail that the Fuji print is showing. This leads me to conclude that the printer is the main limiting device with a 2880 dpi scan at 8x10. When Epson releases a 1 picoliter printer the 4000 dpi scanners will be a necessity for producing the sharpest prints. And as you are saying a 4000 dpi scanner will give one a better shot at producing decent large prints using todays inkjet printers. Ray
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Sumtingwong
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? bjs
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Mike Gaston
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Robert Kehl
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Robert Kehl
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray Amos
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray McGuinness
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Sumtingwong
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray McGuinness
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray McGuinness
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Sumtingwong
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray McGuinness
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Ray McGuinness
- filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 and L... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 a... Tim Atherton
- Re: filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 a... Tony Sleep