Dennis W. Manasco wrote: > > Confusion arises because most programming languages begin indexing > arrays with the "zeroth" item. Thus the final item in an entirely > filled array whose index is defined as <short> or <char> would be the > 256th item, but its actual index value would be 255 (1111 1111 in > binary). Similarly you find lists capable of storing 65536 items but > integer ranges of +32767 to -32768. This can be a "gotcha" at the > negative limit because some systems define -32768 (1000 0000 0000 > 0000) as minus zero. >
Aha!! I always wondered why the playback window offers (by default) to play from measure 1 to measure 32767. Now I know. Sort-of... ;-) Ch.S. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
