You have mistaken my tone, David:  I agree with you!!  This number 
ballet is fraught with dangers.

(And no, I don't believe you can still use a floppy to do this)

Alan Smith

On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 11:29 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:

> Okay, so the exact mechanism isn't a floppy all the time -- but it CAN 
> be, can't it?
>
> You mention saving the file with a "saving out" feature which means 
> that you get some number and then on your other machine you have to 
> enter the number before you can save your new edits.  And then you have 
> to remember to do it again before you can bring the file back to your 
> first computer?  Now if you DO save your file to a floppy from one 
> computer and then find that the floppy is unreadable on either 
> computer, can you still work with the copy of your file which is still 
> on your first computer, or does making the file portable somehow 
> cripple the first computer's version, just in case you are a nefarious 
> criminal type that might actually be running an engraving sweatshop off 
> of one copy of Sibelius?
>
> So what happens if you forget to write the number down, save the file 
> to movable media, power down the computer and then try to work with the 
> file on your other computer?  Is the number a constant, so that file 
> will always work with the same number, so you could embed it into the 
> file name, or is it randomly generated each time, so if your file is in 
> limbo as I just outlined and when you go back to power up your second 
> computer you find that the motherboard has fried and you can't get it 
> started?  Are you then stuck with your first symphony of 1000 measures, 
> all but completed and a week away from first rehearsal, in an unusable 
> form?
>
> -- David H. Bailey
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to