On 18 Sep 2002 at 17:08, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:

> At 9:33 AM -0400 9/18/02, David W. Fenton wrote:
> >
> >Oh, bollocks. This is an instance where Finale is fundamentally
> >broken. The default behavior of the copy is one issue alone, an ill-
> >chosen default with no sensible alternative. But the real issue is
> >that the process is not *reversible*, that once the mistake has been
> >made, you can't undo it.
> 
> You can undo past the point where you made the first copy that 
> created the mirror. . . .

By the time I discovered the problem, it was too late -- I'd already 
closed Finale.  

But that's not the point -- I should still be able to undo the 
problem somehow with the user interface without needing to delete and 
completely re-assign large parts of the lyrics. Even the unusable 
mirrors allow you to convert a mirror to real text. The mirrored 
copied text should somehow allow you to do the same thing, with 
options of NEW VERSE or APPEND TO VERSE n when you do it. But there's 
nowhere in the user interface to allow you to suggest a block of 
lyrics in the score and perform an action on it.

I think this is all very, very poorly implemented because the 
abstracted user interface allows the user to think about the data in 
a fashion that leads to problems while not actually providing 
sufficient connections between the representation and the underlying 
data store to make it safe to do so.

-- 
David W. Fenton                         |        
http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates                 |        
http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to