On 7 Jun 2003 at 10:00, Philip M. Aker wrote:

> On Saturday, Jun 7, 2003, at 03:13 America/Vancouver, David H. Bailey 
> wrote:
> > Perhaps, given the tardiness in making Finale fully OSX compliant, it 
> > is the Mac market which is the drag these days.
> 
> Nope. It's Coda not having had their ear to the ground 6 years ago when 
> Apple sent out copious notes about coming changes.

Coda was very slow with the Win32 release, too. Win32 was coming from 
about 1990 or so, and Coda did not release a 32-bit version until 
Finale97, and because of problems with 16-bit thunking layers for 
MIDI, it did not run on NT until Finale98. Win95 came out in August 
'95, NT 4 came out in '96, so Coda was quite a ways behind.

However, it wasn't until the release of Win2K that NT compatibility 
became really crucial and by that time, they'd made the conversion.  

I think that Code is following exactly the same path with OS X as 
they did with Win32, and my guess is that this involves a major code 
restructuring and maybe even a conversion to new development tools, 
just as the WinFin97 release marked the abandonment of the old 
codebase and a switch to Microsoft development tools.

-- 
David W. Fenton                        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates                http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to