Chuck Israels wrote:
On Oct 14, 2004, at 2:55 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Owain, It's a different theoretical model. Of course it's "wrong" according to the standard theoretical model -- it's an alternative theory of tonality, modality, harmony, etc. If it didn't reject the norms of the standard model it wouldn't be an alternative theory, would it?
Sure it's wrong, but only as wrong as the claims that western tonality is some inherent product of the overtone series.
Isn't it? Where else did it come from?
Chuck
I bought mine out of the back of a Buick on 132nd street, way back in '58. :-)
-- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
