Jari Williamsson wrote:
d. collins wrote:
I have two tied notes followed by a third note: should the slur ending on the third note start on the first or the second of the tied notes.
FWIW, both Garner Read (page 267) and Kurt Ross (page 141) mentions a tie not covered completely by the slur as "incorrect". But of course this doesn't deal with historical editions (just like ties over barlines are now considered to be the "correct" notation, compared to putting dots after the barline or notes directly on the barline).
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Could you clarify which of Garner Read's books you are citing to?
I am aware of six books he has written and suspect you are referencing
the book entitled "Source Book of Proposed Music Notation Reforms" [I'm quoting since underline/italics is not available].
I do not possess his books and am at a disadvantage to determine what you are citing.
--
John Poole
Editions Poole http://www.editionspoole.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
