On 5 Apr 2006 at 15:55, Karen wrote:

> Naw...I understand the concept that was in the linked article that's 
> why I put "virtual" in parenthesis....but maybe that was a poor way 
> of saying it.
> 
> By "virtual" I meant a partition that can be created without having 
> to reformat the whole drive like we did in the past. I guess non-
> destructive covers that though.

The word "virtual" implies that it's not a normal partition, when in 
fact, it's a perfectly normal partition. Nondestructive 
repartitioning of Windows/DOS drives has been available for over a 
decade, so there's nothing at all surprising about such a feature, 
and no call at all for the use of the term "virtual."

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to