Which is totally not true nowadays. Maybe a couple of years ago..........
I don't think I'd want a program that is just GOOD at a lot of things. I
like my tools to be excellent. Digital Performer for my sampling,
sequencing and basic notation, and Finale for my advanced notation. A
good analogy would be Adobe Photoshop, and InDesign.......it would be
terrible to combine those two programs together, but they work well
together.
I would really love Finale, one of these days, to fix it's Standard Midi
importing. Sometimes it works great, and sometimes not.........
John T Sylvanis wrote:
Stu, thanks,
No, I'm not a MACie, for the simple reason that I can't build them.
Wintel gave me the great advantage to do so and never regretted my
choice. The possibilities are limitless. Too, to get a really good MAC
one needs real money, whereas a good Wintel I can build easily under $700
because I can reuse many of the elements of the older computer. Only a
newer MoBo will be needed. Well, enough with the techie stuff.
Maybe I want too much, but I think my quest is not at all unreasonable
when suggesting unification such that a package comports GOOD notation,
GOOD sequencing and GOOD sapling on par with GOOD sequencing software,
GOOD notation software and GOOD sampling software, and all of these
COMPLETE.
Sincerely, John.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
