That may be, the point still remains: produce notation software that has realistic rendition which then can be recorded to media. CD or tape or whatever may come in the future, for a demo. This will liberate the composer from his eternal dependence of the musicians or conductors. Why should the incredible efforts of so many remain forever anonymous because they either don't have the money to hire musicians or connection to a willing conductor to play their work with an orchestra? When I was a member of the conducting team at a world famous orchestra, I could only see the piles of hand and painstakingly written scores that were laying in a corner at the orchestra's library because the orchestra simply did not have the physical time to fit them into the season's programs.
So, again, self-producing a decent demo is the answer. This will not render the musicians obsolete, since in order to produce a commercially viable recording one will need live musicians and a studio. Just the demo gentlemen. John. On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:29:02 -0400 "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 6 Oct 2006 at 20:42, John T Sylvanis wrote: > > > I use the term integration as the ability > > to make the programs inside a package communicate seamlessly. > > That's an idiosyncratic definition that doesn't have much merit. > > In any event, even that would be quite difficult and probably not > justified in the case of a program like Finale. > > -- > David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com > David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
