Johannes wrote: > No, he just used very thin lines. If you print this example it will look > pretty awful, at least to my eyes. If you look at the example at high > magnification you will still see that the lines don't anti-alias, and > display slightly different thicknesses.
The lines are very thin, but showing identical thicknesses here. I enlarged to 6400% on Acrobat Reader 8 with no issues. And the curves (which are normally disasters in print-to-Postscript displays) also show as curves, not at all jagged. The beams are not showing up as multiple lines at any magnification, which is a characteristic of print-to-Postscript under Windows. And the file size is very small. Now if I can see one of these with embedded graphics.... :) Dennis _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
