I just used the Acrobat 7 printer driver. No "compile postscript" - You see why I'm quite happy with Finale's PDF output now...;-) BUT I adjusted the staff line width in Finale.
In fact, I have wonderful output from any program whatsoever. In Quark Xpress, you can also "save as postscript" - I get better results just using the Acrobat (professional) output in Windows XP. No complaints whatsoever. Kurt > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im > Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. September 2007 21:47 > An: finale@shsu.edu > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Finale] Converting from Sibelius to Finale > > > Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, > is > > also > > a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily. > > This does not address the fact that Finale's "Compile Postscript > Listing" > function produces a perfect display. Finale prints to Postscript and > compiles Postscript quite differently. > > Just look at the Postscript listings themselves. They're different > almost > immediately -- and it doesn't matter which Postscript driver is used. > I've > been through dozens because I have many installed for different print > jobs. > > I also have Distiller, Ghostscript and docPrint Pro. The same results > occur with those -- great results from "Compile Postscript Listing" and > terrible from printing to Postscript. > > The example you posted looks like the quality display produced by > "Compile > Postscript Listing" rather than print-to-Postscript. What was your > printing sequence from Finale? And what printer driver were you > printing > to? > > Dennis > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
