David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jun 2009 at 9:30, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]> I don't know. While one could say that Apple had an
agenda, MS came
late to that ballgame.
Why would Apple and Microsoft have an incentive to misrepresent the
research? What good would it do them to design their products to be
less useful than they could be?
To sell mice.
*snort*
Yes, that's it -- Microsoft's mice are such high-profit items that
they want to sell them.
If they're not such high-profit items, why do they sell
them? After all, Microsoft is a software company. And Bill
Gates and his heirs-to-the-company are much too smart to
sell items they take a loss on.
--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
