At 12:23 AM -0400 6/2/10, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 1 Jun 2010 at 20:17, John Howell wrote:

 Please forgive a very traditional musician, but what in the world
 would a square bracket above indicate?  It would mean nothing to me,
 so I would have to ignore it.  (As David said regarding new notation
 that is not universally understood.)

I understood immediately what he meant by it. Something like this:

p. 4, m. 67, tenor part
http://tinyurl.com/2f8g4kn =>
http://tearesofthemuses.com/Editions/Scores/Trio/Byrd-Walsingham-
%e03.pdf

It's a case where I want to clarify that the middle part is in 12/4
while the other two parts are in 3/1.

OK, yes, I'd understand that immediately and intuitively. I just don't think I've come across it before. And was the point (which I've lost track of) that it means the same thing in modern music, then?

Of course the same thing happens in the treble in bar 66, and that is not marked. And the figures starting in 108 are marked differently (and I agree with the groupings). And the motives starting at 116 are especially interesting. It's hard NOT to play the beginnings as syncopes.

Does the transcription work as well as it looks that it should on paper?

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to