If that is the case, it seems pointless to go to all the trouble and
expense of including Garritan.
The thing that I am suggesting is actually pretty easy to do. Worst
case, you simply iterate through each staff as a solo track as Randolph
described. But with 25 staves, I'm not going to do that by hand.
I have not used any of the scripting language. Is this the sort of
thing that could be done with a script?
On 6/6/2010 10:39 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On 6/6/2010 9:00 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
The upshot is that for Finale to be taken serious as a rendering tool,
it needs to either produce independent WAV files per track or else
become an order of magnitude easier to achieve a reasonable mix.
Personally, I don't think Finale is intended to be taken seriously as
a rendering tool. I think it's a notation tool which happens to have
some halfway decent tools for producing audio output.
This is a little like saying, "If Microsoft Word wants to be taken
seriously as a layout program....". Word is a word processor which
also gives you the ability to do some basic layout. But it will never
come close to the abilities of a real layout program, like InDesign or
Quark.
(This is where one of the listers -- I forget who -- jumps in and says
that they have long used Finale as a word processor.)
Just my $0.02. I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice for Finale to do
what you want, just that I think it's outside its declared scope.
Aaron.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
