On 7 Feb 2011 at 13:28, Steve Parker wrote: > Found one on the web. > > http://www.music.informatics.indiana.edu/media/don/chopinnocturnediffd > urs_context2.jpg > > There is so much 'technically' rhythmically wrong and unclear here. Of > course it is perfectly clear and expressive. Imagine writing it as > played and it feels like a different piece
The F# Nocturne -- I played it. I don't know what your point is by citing it. It doesn't at all relate to the topic we were speaking about -- it introduces a whole host of unrelated issues (so far as I can see). And that's the Paderewski edition, which does not necessarily represent what was in Chopin's autograph. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
