On 1 Mar 2011 at 22:03, Gerhard Torges wrote: > Am 28.02.2011 um 23:47 schrieb David W. Fenton: > > > On 28 Feb 2011 at 22:35, Gerhard Torges wrote: > > > >> Am 28.02.2011 um 21:22 schrieb David W. Fenton: > >> > >>> I don't think conversion is really an option, as it requires > >>> completely redoing the layout (or, at least, proofing to make sure > >>> the layout is unchanged). > >> > >> That may be the case today. > > > > It will be the case for these older versions forever. > > Only until someone writes a better converter for these.
No one is ever going to do this. There are simply no incentives to do so, particularly since the file format is completely undocumented and changes from version to version. I'm not even sure if it would be legal to do so, as reverse engineering proprietary data structures is one of those things that has landed any number of people in court. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
