Once you get a nice library set up (with that tiny little un-resizeable edit 
window where the nudge buttons don't work!) it is pretty painless. I have many, 
many issues with the chord tool, though.

Christopher


On Thu May 15, at ThursdayMay 15 5:23 PM, John Roberts wrote:

> Thank you both for the input. I've usually used lyrics for chord 
> symbols, using one of the Metronome fonts which mixes music symbols with 
> texts and has a nice set of superscript numbers, but I was getting a 
> random bug in Fin2012 where lyrics would suddenly get out of sync with 
> their corresponding music. 2014 crashes too much so I went back to 2012, 
> and decided to try the chord tool more seriously. But I don't much like 
> the results, or the effort/results ratio.
> John
> 
> 
> On 5/15/14, 12:22 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
>> I think all that's required is an "Horizontal offset for chords with
>> alterations" setting.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Simon Troup | BA Hons (Mus)
>> http://www.digitalmusicart.com
>> 
>> Partners: Simon Troup & Jennie Troup
>> VAT Registration: 982 4230 17
>> 
>> *"If you can twang it, we can engrave it. Seriously, we can. No... really!"*
>> 
>> *This email is a private communication between the sender and the intended
>> recipient. If you received this email in error be advised that all content,
>> information and files contained in the message remain copyright of the
>> author, artist or original copyright holder and may not be used without
>> permission.*
>> 
>> 
>> On 15 May 2014 17:01, Christopher Smith 
>> <christopher.sm...@videotron.ca>wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm bugged by it. In fact the thing that bugs me most is that if you open
>>> up a bit of space to allow for the sharp, then a root WITHOUT an alteration
>>> seems to have too BIG of a gap.
>>> 
>>> I created a whole set of custom suffixes, but of course Finale being what
>>> it is, they took me a very long time and I'm still not happy with them,
>>> partly because of the gap problem.
>>> 
>>> Christopher
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu May 15, at ThursdayMay 15 11:02 AM, Simon Troup wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi John
>>>> 
>>>> I've often suggested offsets for such scenarios but never, until you've
>>>> mentioned this, found anyone else who was bothered by Finale's lack of
>>>> precision in this respect. My suffix libraries include a duplicate set of
>>>> suffixes which start about 5 EVPU further to the right for those I use
>>> most
>>>> often. You'll probably find my posts about it in the Finale forums by
>>>> searching for "Chord Suffix Kerning" or similar. Then again, maybe this
>>> has
>>>> been updated, or there's a better way to do it, so I'm very interested to
>>>> see what anyone else has to say about it.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Simon Troup | BA Hons (Mus)
>>>> http://www.digitalmusicart.com
>>>> 
>>>> Partners: Simon Troup & Jennie Troup
>>>> VAT Registration: 982 4230 17
>>>> 
>>>> *"If you can twang it, we can engrave it. Seriously, we can. No...
>>> really!"*
>>>> 
>>>> *This email is a private communication between the sender and the
>>> intended
>>>> recipient. If you received this email in error be advised that all
>>> content,
>>>> information and files contained in the message remain copyright of the
>>>> author, artist or original copyright holder and may not be used without
>>>> permission.*
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 15 May 2014 15:56, John Roberts <an...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm finding that when I add a chord suffix to an altered chord, eg F#7,
>>>>> the suffix is too close to the # sign. It's fine with a plain chord
>>>>> letter name. Is there a way to add some space after the accidental? I
>>>>> suppose I could create a whole duplicate set of symbols with a little
>>>>> extra space before each one but this seems overkill.
>>> 


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

Reply via email to