On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:58:37PM +0100, "D. Höhn" wrote: > If you would like to continue this important work, I would be more than > happy to setup a roadmap of your goals and sync them with the Fink team, > being your proxy.
Sure, I'd like to see such a roadmap to get an idea of what parts of fink are most critical. I'll probably also have a look at some CVS statistics to see what parts of the code you guys tend to touch most often and focus on that. > >Can I go ahead and supply patches that will improve and change the module > >interface? > As I said above, yes of course. According to some it is bitterly needed. > Furthermore the Dependency enhone seems to need a reqrite, yet no one is > willing to touch it. Do you want to ? Maybe after I understand fink a bit better. However, RR pointed out that horrid $item->[3] stuff. I should be able to at least convert that to a hash or if nothing else, $item->[NAME] to make it a little more easier to read. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Do not try comedy at home! Milk & Cheese are advanced experts! Attempts at comedy can be dangerously unfunny! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
