Ben Hines wrote:


On Dec 22, 2003, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:


Solutions: Either one allows gettext-dev to Depend on libiconv-dev (but this not only violates policy but may also break bootstrapping, because gettext-dev might be needed before libiconv is built), or all packages that are susceptible to be hit


That is never a solution and c an not be. Things are builddpeendsonly for a reason, in this case to support gettext 2 in the future.

Yes, but the problem is that gettext-dev de facto already has a kind of run-time dependency on libiconv-dev (whatever run-time means for libraries):


gettext-dev installs libintl.la, and this contains a line

dependency_libs=' -L/sw/lib /sw/lib/libiconv.la'

This is more than a mere BuildDepends should allow.

The deeper problem here is this whole libtool *.la stuff (not that I claim to understand how it is really working) that mimicks the dylib system, but without the sophisticated version number system with its difference between compile-time and run-time names.

--
Martin





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to