On Feb 20, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Having them all Provide a common "placeholder" package only works if they really are drop-in replacements for each other, for example, identical headers, and .dylib links to identically-named and binary-compatible runtime .dylib files. Is that the case here?
No, I don't believe it is, unfortunately.
As an alternative, how about renaming the wxmac package to wxwidgets-mac, and wxgtk to wxwidgets-gtk? This would solve the problem I described earlier, and it wouldn't require any other changes in the .info files, except for trivial changes in the handful of packages in unstable that currently depend on wxmac or wxgtk. And I'd be happy to volunteer to commit those changes.
Trevor
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
