On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Assuming that nothing depends on this, eliminating the package is OK with me. However, the "fink way" to bring a package to the end of its life -- when the package involves a shared library -- is to restructure the package so that it *only* builds the -shlibs splitoff. This way, net-snmp-shlibs and net-snmp-ssl-shlibs can continue to exist for the benefit of anyone who may have compiled something which links to this, but since net-snmp-dev won't exist, nobody in the future can compile anything which will link to it. -- Dave |
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger David R. Morrison
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger TheSin
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger TheSin
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Jeremy Higgs
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on T... Jeremy Higgs
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp ... Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp ... Martin Costabel
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp ... Peter O'Gorman