On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>>>> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage 
>>>> warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, 
>>>> and suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6.
>>>> 
>>>> Another short-term measure would be to put a test into fink to check for 
>>>> Xcode 4.2 on 10.6, and warn users that they should downgrade.
>>>> 
>>>> The question of how and whether to adapt the fink 10.6 release to 
>>>> accomodate this major change by apple is a more difficult one, and will 
>>>> require additional thought as well as time to implement.
>>>> 
>>>> -- Dave
>>> 
>>> Dave,
>>>  The change as implemented on 
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3426897&group_id=17203&atid=317203
>>> will be transparent to current Fink users who aren't on 10.6 with Xcode 
>>> 4.2. The only change for Lion users will be
>>> that the clang compiler wrappers will explictly pass the --arch x86_64 
>>> (which again should be a transparent change
>>> and cause no issues).
>>>   I been able to build...
>> 
>> 
>> Lots of questions here, including:
>> 1) Do things build differently?  One of our main design principles in fink 
>> is that things should build the same for everybody.
>> 2) Any problem with mixing and matching, i.e., upgrading the compiler on an 
>> already-installed fink?
>> 
>>  -- Dave
> 
> Dave,
>  Any thoughts on the alternative approach as implemented in...
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3427243&group_id=17203&atid=317203
> 
> Checking for 10.6 in the path-prefix-10.6 compiler-wrapper and substituting 
> gcc-4.2 and g++-4.2
> for instances of cc/gcc and c++/g++ seems the least invasive approach. 
> Hopefully we can fix this
> issue in the near term.
>       Jack
> ps It is unfortunate that we can't offer clang support to SL users but 
> without a blanket adoption of 
> clang for SL Xcode 4.2, I don't see the user base being big enough to merit 
> the changes for a UseClang
> option.
> 
>> 

Jack,

I believe that Alexander and Max are testing this with plans to release it soon.

  -- Dave



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn 
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to