On Sat, April 26, 2014 11:14 am, Jack Howarth wrote: > Hanspeter, > What is the logic behind making boost1.55 build against the > g++-fsf-4.8 compiler instead of clang++ on 10.9 and later? By doing that, > you require any program that links against boost1.55 and all of its > support > libraries to be built with g++-fsf-4.8. We were very careful when > Mavericks > landed to make sure that boost1.53 properly built against libc++ from > clang++ rather than any of the libstdc++ releases (system or fsf gcc). > This > seems like a major regression in the packaging compared to boost1.53. I am > surprised you resorted to that as the newer boost release should have even > more libc++ related fixes than 1.53 did. > Jack
Jack, I'm currently traveling and unable to test any issues until Wednesday at the earliest, but more likely not until the weekend. I'm OK with the < 10.9 conditional you put in to build with clang++ on 10.9 (plus the atomic patch). I'll be back towards the middle/end of the week to further discuss as needed. If you feel more changes are needed, please discuss on here or on #fink with dmacks since he'll understand issues that may arise from the package management end. Thanks for your help, Hanspeter -- More agile than a turtle, stronger than a mouse, nobler than a lettuce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
