On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 15:39, Martin Costabel wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > > > So I took a page from their book and reworked the Qt packages a bit so > > that things get hand-copied. > > The mystery remains, though. For me, it always worked correctly. I even > built qt3 while make was bsdmake instead of gnumake, just to be sure > that this is not the problem. It built with bsdmake without any problem.
Yeah, I don't understand it either. There have been plenty of people these packages work for. It's gotta be some kind of environment thing, but I can't figure out why. It's obviously affecting a decent number of people though. > This weird ../../../../ that should not be there is introduced by qmake, > IIUC. Is it likely that this qmake that didn't work correctly during the > compilation of qt3 will work correctly afterwards? I believe so, because from what I can tell, the problem is with their build system using relative paths for some of the Qt library directories. Once things are installed, all of those directories are full paths based on $(QTDIR). It's just a hack they did for build purposes. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
