On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:12:33 -0500,
"Richard C. Cobbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[ gnus vs. /bin/hostname on Mac OS X ]

> My experience is that if you edit /etc/hostconfig and change the
> value for the HOSTNAME setting, /bin/hostname will no longer
> return something nonsensical.  (At least, I think that was
> sufficient to get it working.)

Yes, that would work.  I hesitate to monkey with files in /etc/,
though.

> (If you could follow up with a description of your experiences,
> that would be wonderful -- I'd like to remember how I did this,
> in case I have to repeat the process!)

I deja-google'd around a bit, found this thread:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=aae6fc4b76cbb2e0&rnum=1

and eventually ended up with this in my ~/.emacs.el file:

    (require 'message)
    (defun message-make-fqdn ()
      "less.nonsensical.fully.qualified.domain.name")

Now I can post, but it still feels like a kluge.  Note that I
don't use gnus for email, so I don't know how "universal" that
kluge is.  OTOH, given that (a) I don't get a static IP address
from my ISP, and (b) my box is behind a router, a DSL modem, DHCP,
NAT, and PPPoE; what is my FQDN?  This issue seems to be debated
endlessly on usenet (and elsewhere, too, I'm sure), or at least in
such a manner that I can't find the end.

Regards,
Dan

-- 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.tombstonezero.net/dan/>
An omer is a tenth of an ephah. -- Exodus 16:36.


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to