Andrew,

>From this email, I am assuming things are copacetic.

Cheers

On Jan 25, 2008 5:51 PM, asreeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> The problem with the script I previously sent is in the boundary condition
> term. fluxIn should be:
>
> fluxIn.setValue(101.*vel.getDivergence(),where=(Z==ZValue))
>
> not
>
> fluxIn.setValue(101.*discharge.getDivergence(),where=(Z==ZValue))
>
> I'm still using a negative DiffusionTerm in the tranport equation, which
> doesn't make sense to me, but the output matches teh analytic solution.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> ----------------------
> Andrew Reeve
> Dept. of Earth Science
> University of Maine
> Orono, ME 04469
>
>
>



-- 
Daniel Wheeler

Reply via email to