This argument still requires a taxonomy by which a gun, cartridge, feature, 
other arm can be classified by comparison to other arms so that one can 
determine what might make the item in question not in "common use" or both 
"dangerous and unusual."




________________________________
From: Jon Roland <jon.rol...@constitution.org>
To: Daniel D. Todd <dant...@yahoo.com>; Firearms Reg 
<Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2009 7:32:03 PM
Subject: Re: Volokh: California Court of Appeal Upholds Ban

We need to emphasize at every opportunity that it is "common use"
mainly by the military, more than by civilians.

-- Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001    www.constitution.org    jon.rol...@constitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------



      
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to