On 05/09/11 21:15, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 09.05.2011 18:48, Leyne, Sean wrote: >>> I disagree. Shadow is the only method for synchronous replication in >>> Firebird now. >> Synchronous replication on a single server is not replication. > Don't forget about NFS and iSCSI(?).
Why _only_ NFS? That's not true today. Since 2.5 it's possible to place shadows on windows network drives too. There was a number of requests for such feature, and in 2.5 it was implemented. Shadows are alive and supported, and suggestion to drop them is not correct. What about multiple files database - here I agree, it's time for that support to be gone. Even if one wants to use small drives to copy databases in shutdown state between hosts, there are dozens (if not hundreds) of 3d-party software, that can divide file into parts compressing if wanted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel