Get real.  Read about the actual problems. Bthe issue is that there is a
theoretical problem that a manufactured duplicate collision could be
manufactored in something like time 2^82, something that nobody has
actually be able to do.

Sure, SHA-1 has a known weakeness.  It's replacement probably has an as yet
unknown weakness as well.

If you were starting over from scratch, you wouldn't want to use SHA-1 to
avoid wasting time with discussions like this.  See also RC4.  But the
problem with SHA-1 doesn't justify the inconvenience of changing it.

Now, all that said, if the only use of SHA-1 is to flatten the "master key"
in SRP into a session key, then there is no dependency on SHA-1 as a
cryptographic hash, only as randomizing hash, and the weakness is
irrelevant.  But if it's used to store passwords, that's a security problem
so huge that any SHA-1 weakness doesn't even come into it.

Context is everything.

On Sunday, July 26, 2015, Mark Rotteveel <m...@lawinegevaar.nl> wrote:

> I have brought this up before, and it might be a bit annoying that I do
> so again, but I remain concerned by the fact that we are about to ship a
> product (Firebird 3) that uses hashing and encryption algorithms (SHA-1
> and RC4) that most in the industry consider outdated and (relatively)
> insecure.
>
> Organizations are taking actions to deprecate and disable both (eg
> Oracle disabled RC4 in TLS in Java 8 Update 51, the IETF now prohibits
> the use of RC4 in TLS, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7465).
>
> They might still be strong enough for now, but I am also concerned about
> the public image impact of releasing a product with a new security
> feature that uses algorithms considered insecure by todays standards.
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Rotteveel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
>


-- 
Jim Starkey
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to