Em 26/03/2016 07:05, Michal Kubecek escreveu: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:43:11PM +0300, alex wrote: >> >> 25.03.2016 22:48, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes пишет: >>> Em 25/03/2016 16:24, Dmitry Yemanov escreveu: >>>> This gives us a buildno counted in days, not in commits (as now). >>>> >>> In practive it's not different. >>> >>> Doesn't the script is running per day like was in svn? >>> >>> Right, that means the snapshot build has a "perfect" buildno, but the >>> people who download zip does not. >>> >>> With the solution above, we can make snapshot builds to checkout tree or >>> 00:00 hour of the given date, so it can have a perfect buildno that we >>> can convert to date as well. >> >> One question - if there are no commits for some days (typical for stable >> branches) will buildno anyway be incremented every day? If yes IMHO this >> is not good. > > Both Adriano's and my proposal calculate the build number from the > (commit) date of the latest commit, not current date. So if there is a > commit on Friday and next is on Monday, you get the same build number > for the Saturday, Sunday and Monday snapshot (assuming snapshots are > taken on midnight or shortly after) but it is raised by 3 once the > Monday commit appears. In other words, there is no need to build a new > daily snapshot if there are no commits since the last one. >
Yes. And just to be sure I tested that this last commit date really works per branch. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
