On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:02:48PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.04.2016 18:58, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > Disabling it unconditionally is not a good idea. Perhaps it could be
> > controlled via firebird.conf but I would still prefer the connection
> > string as more flexible.
>
> Extract IPv6 support from remote to a separate plugin.
That doesn't make much sense to me. Actually one of my long term plans
is to refactor struct rem_port into a hierarchy of classes. But I don't
see much benefit in providing support for different protocols in the
form of plugins.
While I'm not opposed to the possibility to confine the client to IPv4
(or IPv6), I definitely don't like the idea of making that a default.
Seriously, it's 2016, not 1996.
Michal Kubecek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
